Daily Analysis 28 June 2022 (10-Minute Read)
A terrific Tuesday to you as stocks pull back on the back of higher energy prices with high inflation and risks to economic growth dampening sentiment.
In brief (TL:DR)
U.S. stocks opened weaker on Monday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.20%), S&P 500 (-0.30%) and the Nasdaq Composite (-0.72%) all closing lower on Monday as higher energy costs increased concerns over persistent inflation.
Asian stocks fluctuated Tuesday as investors question whether central banks can raise interest rates to rein in inflation without derailing growth.
Benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury yields fell to 3.176% (yields fall when bond prices rise) on growth concerns leading to a reversal in risk appetite.
The dollar slipped in Asian trading.
Oil gained with August 2022 contracts for WTI Crude Oil (Nymex) (+1.05%) at US$110.72 as the continued absence of Russian crude from global markets continued to weigh on the supply side of the equation.
Gold inched higher with August 2022 contracts for Gold (Comex) (+0.12%) at US$1,827.00.
Bitcoin (-2.04%) fell to US$20,724, as risk appetite waned against increasing concerns over a global recession and the prospect of stagflation.
In today's issue...
Bank of International Settlements Warns of Stagflation
Exxon Mobil CEO Warns that Abrupt Shift to Renewables Could be Disaster
Crypto's Picks & Shovels Trade More Volatile than Underlying Asset Tracked
Global investors are having to contend with the double whammy of slowing growth and high inflation, with central banks unlikely to be able to rescue markets at this juncture, especially given their focus on putting a lid on price pressures.
The odds of a recession are on the rise, and institutional portfolio rebalancing as another quarter draws to a close will heighten volatility in an attempt to maintain a mix of stocks and bonds, which would explain the recent pullback in yields.
Asian markets were mixed with Tokyo's Nikkei 225(-0.15%), Seoul's Kospi Index (-0.04%) and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index (-0.86%) down, while Sydney’s ASX 200 (+0.54%) was higher on a rally in commodities in the morning trading session.
1. Bank of International Settlements Warns of Stagflation
The Bank of International Settlements warns that policymakers are at risk of pushing the global economy into stagflation, marked by high inflation and low growth.
Central bankers are hamstrung because they cannot determine if the factors causing inflation are likely to be transitory or durable and how to respond to them is oftentimes a political rather than economic exercise.
The global economy may be teetering on the brink as it enters a new era of soaring inflation which requires central banks to raise rates, threatening even more malaise, at least according to the Bank of International Settlements (BIS).
In its annual report, the BIS said that the possibility of stagflation looms over the global economy as dangers of an era of unprecedented inflation dovetails with slowing growth and tighter financial conditions.
Policymakers have raised interest rates to combat record high inflation and no less than 70 central banks have increased borrowing costs, with half of them caving in to implementing outsized rate hikes of 75 basis points or more at a time.
However, keeping inflationary pressures at bay while concurrently softening the impact on economic activity is a large ask, and the likelihood is high that policymakers will get it wrong, which is why the BIS is suggesting that odds of a favorable outcome could improve if policies tighten in a timely and decisive manner.
But trying to enact policy when the economic sands are constantly shifting is like trying to juggle while driving a car blindfolded.
Policymakers are not soothsayers and can only respond to real-time data on the fly, which is bad for businesses trying to plan out their inventories, purchases and hiring.
Under such circumstances, companies will understandably err on the side of caution, especially if sentiment and outlook appear poor.
Complicating matters is that righting monetary policy, especially after decades of easy conditions, is challenging both politically and practically.
The Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve serves at the President’s pleasure for four-year terms, and who would want a recession as their legacy?
U.S. midterm elections are also around the corner and if policymakers yank the cord too hard, the landing won’t be hard, the floor will disappear from beneath the American economy.
Which is why the BIS’s call for policymakers to enact “reforms to support long-term growth” which paves the way for more normalized “fiscal and monetary policy settings” is more aspirational than practical and which is why investors should expect more inconsistency and volatility.
There are no more low-hanging fruit in fixing monetary and fiscal policy because the global economy has gotten so punch drunk off liquidity that the hangover is too much for most policymakers to bear.
2. Exxon Mobil CEO Warns that Abrupt Shift to Renewables Could be Disaster
Global economy continues to demand access to affordable energy and sudden shift to renewables could stymie long term structural changes needed to combat climate change.
Oil and gas sector represents a good interim buy, but investors may be wary of holding on to winning trades for too long as once supply normalizes, ESG concerns may outweigh practical deliverables from legacy energy sector.
Years of underinvestment in fossil fuels and extraction have meant that even the slightest supply shocks can have serious repercussions throughout the global economy. Which is why Exxon Mobil (+2.45%) CEO Darren Woods cautions that a sudden shift to renewable energy will culminate in unideal outcomes for society. In an interview with CNBC’s David Faber, Woods was wary of government policy that would fail to harmonize the “current demand for affordable energy with the need for lower emissions” adding that an “underinvestment in the oil and gas industry” was the root cause of higher prices. U.S. President Joe Biden is battling record low approval ratings and appealing to the energy industry to pump out more as is their patriotic duty, but the call is falling on deaf ears as the sector has suffered years of regulations and financial penalties for its ties to carbon emissions. To that end Woods is correct in suggesting that the transition needs to be gradual to be sustainable and Biden’s call for more affordable energy is perhaps what is politically expedient as opposed to what is practically possible. Woods states that higher oil and gas prices are already forcing European consumers to a corner to utilize fossil fuels such as coal, instead of renewable energy, because in desperate times, people will understandably reach for what is most readily accessible. Europe’s economic powerhouse Germany, has long relied and expected an easy and cheap supply of Russian gas to fuel its industrialized economy, only to realize that the horse trade it made with Putin left it extremely vulnerable should tensions flare up.
Years of underinvestment in alternative energy sources, let alone renewable ones, has meant that Germany has had to turn to coal for the first time in decades, a highly pollutive fuel.
In trying to pursue renewables, politicians may have thrown the baby out with the bath water, as evidenced from the current mad scramble to replace Russian gas with anything else.
Woods reaffirmed his company’s commitment to balancing existing demands for affordable energy together with the need for reduced emissions, but it perhaps took the current crisis to serve as a wake-up call that transitions need time.
To that end, the legions of renewable energy companies, years away from likely generating any meaningful amount of electricity to the grid, could be interesting long-term speculative bets, especially if they are attracting deep discounts at the moment (they are not).
If and when energy markets normalize again, it’s less clear if the recent rally in the oil and gas sector will be durable, because investors have a habit of forgetting the immediate issues to gamble on the next shiny new thing.
3. Crypto's Picks & Shovels Trade More Volatile than Underlying Asset Tracked
Investors betting on listed cryptocurrency firms have been more heavily exposed to volatility as business and commercial risk is lumped onto companies dealing in already volatile assets.
Investors looking for exposure into crypto would have been better off just buying the tokens to begin with as corporations cottoning on to the rise and fall of the industry prove far more volatile and susceptible to downturns.
The “picks and shovels” trade was very attractive in the early days of cryptocurrency’s admission into the mainstream investor consciousness.
Part of the reason for this of course was that outside of Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust vehicle, there were few (if any) institutional gateways to participation in the cryptocurrency sector.
And investors loathe to fumble with private keys and unregulated exchanges found themselves betting on the listed companies that serviced the cryptocurrency sector, from miners to exchanges.
But far from track the rise and fall of the cryptocurrency markets, these listed cryptocurrency firms have ended up tracking most of the decline, with just a hint of the rally.
Over the past week, underwhelming results from listed cryptocurrency firms have seen shares in their company fall, despite a recovery in broader indices.
Since December, some of the biggest names in the cryptocurrency sector are down mor than the cryptocurrencies that they facilitate the trading in or have on their books with Coinbase Global (-10.76%) down 75%, to MicroStrategy (-4.24%) which is down 62%, or more than the 60% fall in Bitcoin over the same period%.
Digital token mining giants like Marathon Digital (-7.68%) and Riot Blockchain (-5.78%) have also fallen faster than Bitcoin and that’s because contrary to popular belief, listed crypto companies aren’t “crypto lite” promising all of the flavor and none of the fat.
Whereas buying a cryptocurrency outright exposes an investors to one level of volatility, buying a company involved in the business also introduces new layers of risk, including management and business model.
If nothing else, betting on cryptocurrency companies is akin to taking leveraged bets on what is already one of the most volatile asset classes on earth.
Buying listed crypto companies is not for the fainthearted, nor for those unwilling to do the work – it requires a study not just of the cryptocurrency sector, but the business models, management teams and other factors required from typical equity investing.
The information contained in this email communication and any attachments is for information purposes only, and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be in violation of any local laws. It does not constitute a recommendation or take into account the particular allocation objectives, financial conditions, or needs of specific individuals. The price and value of the digital assets and any digital asset allocations referred to in this email communication and the value of such digital asset may fluctuate, and allocators may realize losses on these digital assets, whether digital or financial including a loss of principal digital asset allocations.
Past performance is not indicative nor does it guarantee future performance. We do not provide any investment, tax, accounting, or legal advice to our clients, and you are advised to consult with your tax, accounting, or legal advisers regarding any potential allocation of digital assets. The information and any opinions contained in this email communication have been obtained from sources that we consider reliable, but we do not represent such information and opinions as accurate or complete, and thus such information should not be relied upon as such.
No registration statement has been filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, any U.S. State Securities Authority or the Monetary Authority of Singapore. This email and/or its attachments may contain certain "forward‐looking statements", which reflect current views with respect to, among other things, future events and the performance of a digital asset allocation with the Novum Alpha Pte. Ltd. ("the Company"). Readers can identify these forward‐ looking statements by the use of forward‐looking words such as "outlook", "believes", "expects", "potential", "aim", "continues", "may", "will", "are becoming", "should", "could", "seeks", "approximately", "predicts", "intends", "plans", "estimates", "assumed", "anticipates", "positioned", "targeted" or the negative version of those words or other comparable words.
In particular, this includes forward‐looking statements regarding, growth of the blockchain industry, digital assets and companies, the venture capital and crowdfunding market, as well as the potential returns of any digital asset allocation with the Company. Any forward‐looking statements contained in this email and/or its attachments are based, in part, upon historical performance and on current plans, estimates and expectations. The inclusion of forward‐looking information, should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the future plans, estimates or expectations contemplated will be achieved. Such forward‐looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to the operations, results, condition, business prospects, growth strategy and liquidity of the Company, including those risks described in a separate set of documents. If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if the underlying assumptions of the Company prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated in this email and/or its attachments.
Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward‐looking statements. All performance and risk targets contained herein are subject to change without notice. There can be no assurance that the Company will achieve any targets or that there will be any return on a digital asset allocation with the Company. Historical returns are not predictive of future results. The Company is intended to be a specialist digital asset allocation and trading vehicle in the early stage technology sector and digital assets. Allocation of digital assets in early stage technology carry significantly greater risks and may be considered high risk and volatile. There is a risk of total loss of all digital assets allocated with the Company – please refer to a separate set of documents for a details of risks.
By accepting this communication you represent, warrant and undertake that: (i) you have read and agree to comply with the contents of this notice, and (ii) you will treat and safeguard this communication as strictly private and confidential and agree not to reproduce, redistribute or pass on this communication, directly or indirectly, to any other person or publish this communication, in whole or in part, for any purpose.