Daily Analysis 25 April 2022 (10-Minute Read)
Hello there,
A magnificent Monday to you as markets continue to get mauled with Beijing doubling down on its zero-Covid policy while simultaneously conducting a purge in the Chinese financial services sector.
In brief (TL:DR)
U.S. stocks closed sharply down on Friday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-2.82%), S&P 500 (-2.77%) and the Nasdaq Composite (-2.77%) all awash in red on myriad concerns from policy tightening to slowing economic growth.
Asian markets sank Monday as China’s worsening Covid situation amplified concerns about a slowdown in demand in the world’s second-largest economy.
Benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury yields fell five basis points to 2.85% (yields fall when bond prices rise) on heightened uncertainty.
The dollar extended an advance as investors opted for safe havens.
Oil continued to sink with June 2022 contracts for WTI Crude Oil (Nymex) (-2.83%) at US$99.18 on continued concerns over Chinese demand.
Gold provided no safe harbor with June 2022 contracts for Gold (Comex) (-0.52%) at US$1,924.30 as all assets have been dumped.
Bitcoin (-1.25%) slipped into the week again at US$39,081 (at the time of writing) and looking well on its way to crash through several key support levels at US$38,500 as a bout of fear has set in on all manner of assets.
In today's issue...
Don’t Expect Slower Growth to Change the Fed’s Mind
Beating Ploughshares into Swords
NFTs Never Give Up
Market Overview
Fears a wider lockdown in the Chinese capital amid the government’s steadfast adherence to its Covid-zero policy is spooking investors worried about disruptions to the global supply chain and demand.
The outlook for inflation continues to overhang the markets. U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell endorsed a 50 basis-point increase next month and at least one more such move, outlining his most bold approach yet to reining in surging prices.
Stronger tightening signals from the European Central Bank are also undermining risk appetite.
Asian markets opened Monday uniformly lower with Seoul's Kospi Index (-1.42%), Tokyo's Nikkei 225 (-1.60%), Sydney’s ASX 200 (-1.57%) and Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index (-2.58%) all down in the morning trading session.
1. Don't Expect Slower Growth to Change the Fed's Mind
The rapid slowdown in the U.S. economy comes on the back of a scorching 6.9% of growth in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Because the U.S. Federal Reserve is more focused on inflation right now, there are growing concerns that higher commodity prices and borrowing costs will be the double-whammy that will possibly tip the economy into recession.
With the U.S. dealing with the fastest pace of price increases in over four decades, poorer-than-expected economic growth is unlikely to shake an increasingly hawkish U.S. Federal Reserve.
Driven largely by a reversal of the last quarter’s unexpected boom in inventory accumulation, the U.S. Department of Commerce is widely expected to report on Thursday that the U.S. economy grew at an annualized pace of just 1% in the first three months of 2022, according to a survey of economists by Reuters.
The rapid slowdown in the U.S. economy comes on the back of a scorching 6.9% of growth in the fourth quarter of 2021, when companies were looking to stock up on their inventories to cater to the expected post-pandemic surge in demand against the backdrop of fraying supply chains.
Late last year, the flow of goods around the world eased and businesses found themselves producing far more than they sold in the fourth quarter of 2021, driving inventories higher and sending production lower in the first quarter of 2022.
While some analysts expect that personal consumption will rise to whittle down these inventories, that’s not a given because inflation is starting to have a drag on consumer sentiment and the economy is already showing signs of slowing down.
Because the U.S. Federal Reserve is more focused on inflation right now, there are growing concerns that higher commodity prices and borrowing costs will be the double-whammy that will possibly tip the economy into recession.
The Fed can only work with past data, and the effects in the first quarter of higher input and borrowing costs haven’t yet been fully felt because financial conditions still remained relatively loose and household finances remain strong, increasing the risks of policy missteps.
2. Beating Ploughshares into Swords
Unfortunately, 77 years after the end of the Second World War, the world finds itself still dealing with the ideological and national rivalries of the last major global conflict.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has fueled expectations of surging government orders, higher revenues and stronger profits for companies in the defense sector.
Decades of peace have lulled the world into assuming that the unassailable march of globalization would usher in a period of unprecedented wealth and harmony amongst nations, built around global institutions based on mutually beneficial interdependencies.
Unfortunately, 77 years after the end of the Second World War, the world finds itself still dealing with the ideological and national rivalries of the last major global conflict.
Russia and China both plagued by what their leaders believe have been decades of humiliation at the hands of the victorious powers at the end of the Cold War, are forming an authoritarian axis against increasingly tired Western liberal democracies whose populations are loathe to be dragged into another consuming conflict.
Against this backdrop, years of underspending on defense equipment may about to be reversed as the aggressors in the last major global conflict, Germany and Japan, are set to cast off their postwar guilt and gird their loins for the tough task ahead of defending the existing world order.
The obvious beneficiaries of what is likely to be a durable trend in defense spending will be defense contractors whose shares have languished as years of peace led to complacency and underinvestment in global militaries.
After September 11, 2001, most governments focused on the threat of asymmetric warfare from terrorist organizations, and military strategists largely thought that outside of America’s archrival China, conflicts were likely to be limited to skirmishes with irregular forces.
That shift in military doctrine led to global underinvestment (outside of China and Russia) in nation versus nation type weapons such as ballistic missiles and large surface combatants, spending which most benefits defense contractors.
With the world becoming increasingly insecure, an MSCI index tracking aerospace and defense shares has beaten a broader gauge of global stocks by 17% in dollar terms since January, only the third time the sector has outperformed since 1999.
And that may just be the beginning as governments increase military spending on a variety of weapons, especially big-ticket items like fighter aircraft, tanks and armored vehicles.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has fueled expectations of surging government orders, higher revenues and stronger profits for companies in the defense sector.
The abysmal performance of the Russian army, given its serious deficiencies in logistics will also see governments invest and spend more in companies that cater to that most important segment of the defense sector which typically flies under the radar.
Whereas companies like Lockheed Martin (+1.40%) and General Dynamics (-1.29%) make headlines for their high-profile weapons, the less glamorous aspect of fueling and feeding armies is often also the most high-margin segment of the business, which benefits names like Halliburton (-3.23%) and AECOM (-4.93%), which are all logistics providers.
Some analysts have warned that it’s premature to take big bets on the defense sector with regional conflicts in the past having seen similar gains, only to be returned six months later.
Much depends on how an investor views the Russian invasion – as simply a localized conflict, akin to Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, or the belligerence of a nuclear-armed second-rate power trying to reassert its dominance on the global stage.
Either way, Germany and Japan have been woken from their slumber and are likely to spend somewhere in the region of 2% of their GDP on defense.
Investors concerned about the durability could place strategic bets on military logistics providers because offshore deployments by the U.S. are likely to increase in the medium term, which will shore up demand for these services – militaries are likely to buy bedding for soldiers ahead of ballistic missiles.
3. NFTs Never Give Up
Non-fungible token or NFT sales have plunged by around 50% this year alone, a handful of new projects are hoping to revive enthusiasm for a market that lives and dies on hype and sentiment.
It remains to be seen if the recent uptick in volumes is genuine, or if NFT fever has returned to the market, especially if risk appetite wanes against a backdrop of tightening monetary policy.
Despite the challenging year for cryptocurrencies in general and even though best estimates suggest that non-fungible token or NFT sales have plunged by around 50% this year alone, a handful of new projects are hoping to revive enthusiasm for a market that lives and dies on hype and sentiment.
There are some green shoots of recovery, with weekly volume now up around a third from a low in March, according to data from blockchain analytics firm Nansen, but the overall NFT market remains small.
Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase Global (-4.22%) launched an NFT index this week in addition to a trial version of an NFT marketplace that could lead a jump in transactions as the space becomes more accessible for investors.
According to DappRadar, the first quarter of 2022 saw around 200,000 daily unique wallets interacting with NFTs, which could see a surge if even a fraction of Coinbase Global’s 90 million verified users comes onboard to embrace NFT trading.
In a sector already known for speculation, NFTs represent speculation on steroids, as evidenced by the investor who paid around US$2.9 million for Twitter founder Jack Dorsey’s first tweet which was made into an NFT, and which attracted a bid of just US$280 two weeks ago.
Nevertheless, NFT proponents remain undeterred, with new developments from Yuga Labs, the creator of the white-hot Bored Ape Yacht Club, arguably one of the most successful NFT collections, possibly enticing NFT investors back into the fray.
In March, Yuga Labs raised a whopping US$450 million to fuel its expansion plans and its ApeCoin commands a staggering US$4 billion market cap, according to data from CoinMarketCap.
Capitalizing on the popularity of Bored Ape, Coinbase Global last week announced a Bored Ape film series, to drum up interest and trading in the NFTs.
But NFTs are very much art and susceptible to wild price swings – one man’s masterpiece is another man’s madness and data from Nansen confirms that as many as one in three NFT projects have little to no trading, given how users and collectors are constantly moving on the next big thing.
Trading volumes are also highly suspect, with many NFT prices being derived from wash trading (trading amongst insiders to jack up the price).
It remains to be seen if the recent uptick in volumes is genuine, or if NFT fever has returned to the market, especially if risk appetite wanes against a backdrop of tightening monetary policy.
本电子邮件通讯和任何附件中包含的信息仅供参考,不应被视为在任何司法管辖区出售或招揽购买任何证券的要约或要约,如果此类要约或招揽将违反任何当地法律。它不构成建议,也不考虑特定个人的特定分配目标、财务状况或需求。本电子邮件通讯中提及的数字资产和任何数字资产分配的价格和价值以及此类数字资产的价值可能会波动,分配者可能会在这些数字资产上实现损失,无论是数字资产还是金融损失,包括本金数字资产的损失分配.
过去的表现并不具有指示性,也不保证未来的表现。我们不向我们的客户提供任何投资、税务、会计或法律建议,建议您就数字资产的任何潜在分配咨询您的税务、会计或法律顾问。本电子邮件通讯中包含的信息和任何意见均来自我们认为可靠的来源,但我们不代表此类信息和意见准确或完整,因此不应依赖此类信息。_cc781905-5cde- 3194-bb3b-136bad5cf58d_
没有向美国证券交易委员会、任何美国国家证券管理局或新加坡金融管理局提交注册声明。本电子邮件和/或其附件可能包含某些“前瞻性陈述”,这些陈述反映了当前对未来事件和 Novum Alpha Pte 的数字资产配置表现的看法。有限公司(“本公司”)。读者可以通过使用“展望”、“相信”、“预期”、“潜在”、“目标”、“继续”、“可能”、“将”等前瞻性词语来识别这些前瞻性陈述, “正在成为”、“应该”、“可能”、“寻求”、“大约”、“预测”、“打算”、“计划”、“估计”、“假设”、“预期”、“定位”、“目标”或这些词或其他类似词的否定版本。
特别是,这包括关于区块链行业、数字资产和公司、风险投资和众筹市场的增长以及与公司进行任何数字资产配置的潜在回报的前瞻性陈述。本电子邮件和/或其附件中包含的任何前瞻性陈述部分基于历史业绩和当前计划、估计和预期。包含前瞻性信息不应被视为公司或任何其他人对未来计划、估计或预期将实现的陈述。此类前瞻性陈述受到与公司的运营、结果、状况、业务前景、增长战略和流动性有关的各种风险、不确定性和假设的影响,包括在单独的一组文件中描述的风险。如果这些或其他风险或不确定性中的一项或多项成为现实,或者如果公司的基本假设被证明不正确,则实际结果可能与本电子邮件和/或其附件中所示的结果大不相同。_cc781905-5cde-3194-bb3b -136bad5cf58d_
因此,您不应过分依赖任何前瞻性陈述。此处包含的所有绩效和风险目标如有更改,恕不另行通知。 无法保证公司将实现任何目标或与公司进行数字资产配置会有任何回报. 历史回报不能预测未来结果。该公司旨在成为早期技术领域和数字资产的专业数字资产配置和交易工具。早期技术中的数字资产分配具有更大的风险,可能被认为是高风险和波动性的。存在与公司分配的所有数字资产全部损失的风险-有关风险的详细信息,请参阅单独的一组文件。
接受本通讯即表示您声明、保证并承诺:(i) 您已阅读并同意遵守本通知的内容,并且 (ii) 您将严格保密并保护本通讯,并同意不复制、直接或间接地重新分发或传递此通讯给任何其他人,或出于任何目的全部或部分发布此通讯。