Daily Analysis 6 May 2022 (10-Minute Read)
Hello there,
A fantastic Friday to you as market continue to flounder with traders betting on the rising risk of inflation and growing concern that the U.S. Federal Reserve will tip the economy into a recession.
In brief (TL:DR)
U.S. stocks tanked Thursday with the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-3.12%) , S&P 500 (-3.57%) and the Nasdaq Composite (-4.99%) all down sharply on recession fears.
Asian stocks slid with bonds Friday as inflation, rising borrowing costs and China’s Covid lockdowns depressed sentiment.
Benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury yields rose three basis points to 3.06% (yields rise when bond prices fall) as fear gripped the market.
The dollar rose.
Oil edged up with June 2022 contracts for WTI Crude Oil (Nymex) (+0.57%) at US$108.88.
Gold fell with June 2022 contracts for Gold (Comex) (-0.02%) at US$1,875.40.
Bitcoin (-8.19%) fell to US$36,469 (at the time of writing) as 1,000 point Dow correction marks the worst trading day since 2020.
In today's issue...
Blood on the Streets – US$1.3 Trillion Stock Rout
China’s Not a Capitalist Paradise in Communist Clothing
Bitcoin Bleeds Alongside Rest of Market April was Bad, May Could be Worse
Market Overview
Stocks slid with bonds Friday and the dollar rose as inflation, rising borrowing costs and China’s Covid lockdowns depressed sentiment.
Risk aversion has swept away a relief rally in the wake of the U.S. Federal Reserve decision Wednesday.
The U.S. central bank raised interest rates by the most since 2000 while pushing back against talk of super-sized increases.
That led traders to pare back rate-hike bets but sentiment remains vulnerable to ebbing liquidity, illustrated by sharp losses for speculative assets such as Bitcoin.
Asian markets were mostly lower Friday with Tokyo's Nikkei 225 (+0.69%) up, while Seoul's Kospi Index (-1.23%), Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index (-3.57%) and Sydney’s ASX 200 (-2.16%) were all down sharply.
1. Blood on the Streets - US$1.3 Trillion Stock Rout
Traders decided yesterday that the central bank will fail to achieve any of its policy objectives and struggle to fight inflation amidst the lingering threat of recession.
The benchmark S&P 500 lost a whopping 3.6%, wiping out about US$1.3 trillion in market value while the tech-heavy Nasdaq bled 5.1%, the most since September 2020.
The party was barely getting started when the police arrived.
Barely a day after investors cheered a less-than-aggressive U.S. Federal Reserve monetary policy tightening schedule, traders decided yesterday that the central bank will fail to achieve any of its policy objectives and struggle to fight inflation amidst the lingering threat of recession.
Investors sold off everything, stocks, bonds, cryptocurrencies – anything and everything collapsed in a sea of red in a blood bath that left traders slack-jawed at the depth and extent of the crash.
The benchmark S&P 500 lost a whopping 3.6%, wiping out about US$1.3 trillion in market value while the tech-heavy Nasdaq bled 5.1%, the most since September 2020.
Leading the losses were the most speculative corners of the market, including expensive software stocks and loss-making tech firms, while Bitcoin, that bellwether of speculation, that had earlier tested US$40,000 slipped to US$36,000 at the time of writing.
While the fear is palpable, it’s also slightly bizarre when you consider that the Fed did everything within its power to prevent such a situation.
For starters, the Fed clearly communicated it’s expected rate hikes and stuck to it – there were no surprises.
Not only that, but the central bank also made clear that no jumbo-sized hikes could be expected in the next two meetings, which ought to have calmed even the most frayed nerves.
So, what gives?
One possibility of course is that traders took the rally after the Fed policy meeting as an opportunity to exit their positions, take some money off the table, and that fed into a self-fulfilling spiral as algorithmic traders piled into an increasingly crowded trade.
When one domino falls, the rest is likely to go as well.
While some analysts believe that inflation will need to ease before there can be any durable rally, many of the concerns plaguing markets before the Fed meeting are still there – high labor costs, soaring inflation, the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Nothing’s really changed.
And it’s entirely possible that when one market participant sneezes, everyone catches a cold.
Given the number of variables at play in the markets now, there’s just too much uncertainty to call a bottom or a top, but it may be a great time for long-term investors to dollar-cost average on some names that are durable, while keeping some cash for more buying opportunities down the line.
2. China's Not a Capitalist Paradise in Communist Clothing
Never in human history has so much been achieved starting with so little and credit goes to the Chinese people for whom entrepreneurship and the desire for a better life became the driving force that transformed an impoverished country with over a billion people into a superpower.
Investors may find some solace in the series of stimulus measures which Beijing will drip out in the coming weeks, but assumptions about the durability of any sharp turnaround or any interim rally would be misplaced.
In the over four decades since market reforms were instituted by then-Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, China has achieved the seemingly impossible, lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and recreating itself as the world's second largest economy.
Never in human history has so much been achieved starting with so little and credit goes to the Chinese people for whom entrepreneurship and the desire for a better life became the driving force that transformed an impoverished country with over a billion people into a superpower.
But any student of China’s history will know that the arc of Chinese progress eventually reverts to the mean.
Whether it’s the Song dynasty or the Han dynasty, the Qin or the Qing, a combination of complacency and corruption tend to coalesce into eventual and inevitable decline.
Thus goes China – periods of decentralization leading to progress, leading to centralization, leading to decline and so on and so forth, ad infinitum.
Global investors who were less familiar with China’s past assumed that China had finally shaken off the baggage of its seemingly never-ending periods of ascent and decline and embraced a capitalistic system, albeit with Chinese characteristics.
Such assumptions are increasingly looking questionable especially as Beijing has shaken the core belief that at its core, the Chinese Communist Party is pragmatic.
It is not.
According to that belief, the CCP would never do anything to harm the economy, given the social compact that the CCP has with the Chinese people – they would facilitate the economic goodies as long as they looked the other way on personal freedoms.
But Chinese President Xi Jinping’s China has made clear that no such social compact exists, if it ever did – hewing to the doctrine that “north, south, east, west, the Party rules all.”
Despite the devastating effects of pandemic lockdowns, there are few signs that Xi, who’s staked his personal and political reputation on avoiding mass deaths because of the coronavirus, will back down.
So determined is Xi, and the power structure that supports him, to ensure that the President doesn’t lose face or appear to have made a mistake, that Beijing is willing to let China take a significant economic hit rather than accept foreign mRNA vaccines or lift lockdowns.
If this sounds even remotely familiar, that’s because not so long ago, another Chinese leader allowed the same thing to happen – Mao Zedong.
During the Cultural Revolution, an estimated 100 million Chinese lost their lives through starvation as Mao’s ill-conceived plan to industrialize an agrarian nation achieved neither of Mao’s goals – the steel that Chinese farmers were forced to make was of poor quality and essentially unusable, while the land that ought to have been worked was left fallow.
Investors may find some solace in the series of stimulus measures which Beijing will drip out in the coming weeks, but assumptions about the durability of any sharp turnaround or any interim rally would be misplaced.
3. Bitcoin Bleeds Alongside Rest of Market April was Bad, May Could be Worse
Dropping by over 10% to as low as US$35,600 at one point, Bitcoin erased its previous day gain of over 5%, taking other cryptocurrencies along with it.
Not helping matters, Bitcoin has become increasingly correlated with U.S. equities, possibly because of increasing U.S. institutional presence in markets that trade Bitcoin.
In a market that is devoid of confidence, investors would not expect to find a haven in cryptocurrencies, so it’s no surprise then that Bitcoin has tumbled the most since January as the rout in equities and bonds deepens over recession fears.
Dropping by over 10% to as low as US$35,600 at one point, Bitcoin erased its previous day gain of over 5%, taking other cryptocurrencies along with it.
One theory is that traders are wary the U.S. Federal Reserve’s tightening schedule will tip the economy into a recession, but if so, that fear does not square with the market’s initial reaction to the central bank’s rate-setting meeting on Wednesday.
Initially, markets responded to the Fed’s 0.50% rate hike with a sharp rally, especially since policymakers suggested the next two meetings would see similar rate rises and a move away from any prospect of jumbo hikes.
Yet somehow on Thursday, traders woke up to decide that the Fed would not be achieving anything close to a soft landing and fears of recession are being bandied about.
But given that Bitcoin has been unable to break out of its tight trading band in a meaningful way, investor fatigue has taken over at a time when confidence is in short supply.
Not helping matters, Bitcoin has become increasingly correlated with U.S. equities, possibly because of increasing U.S. institutional presence in markets that trade Bitcoin.
Given that there’s nothing to be bullish about in the immediate future when it comes to Bitcoin, some investors are understandably taking money off the table.
Many institutional and professional investors recognize that this is an asset class that they can’t ignore, but at the same time, there’s no need to try and call the lowest low or the highest high and understandably they would want to sit it out until things are clearer.
On the flipside, blockchain data suggests that the amount of Bitcoin being siphoned off to cold wallets has increased, suggesting that most investors have turned to long-term holders and are neither in a rush to buy or sell.
For now, most of the trading activity in Bitcoin is amongst those who don’t want to take a long-term view one way or the other, which has (so far) prevented a capitulation for Bitcoin below US$35,000 but is also why it’s hard for the cryptocurrency to break out above US$40,000.
There’s simply too much uncertainty in the market right now that it’s completely understandable if investors just want to cling on to cash.
本电子邮件通讯和任何附件中包含的信息仅供参考,不应被视为在任何司法管辖区出售或招揽购买任何证券的要约或要约,如果此类要约或招揽将违反任何当地法律。它不构成建议,也不考虑特定个人的特定分配目标、财务状况或需求。本电子邮件通讯中提及的数字资产和任何数字资产分配的价格和价值以及此类数字资产的价值可能会波动,分配者可能会在这些数字资产上实现损失,无论是数字资产还是金融损失,包括本金数字资产的损失分配.
过去的表现并不具有指示性,也不保证未来的表现。我们不向我们的客户提供任何投资、税务、会计或法律建议,建议您就数字资产的任何潜在分配咨询您的税务、会计或法律顾问。本电子邮件通讯中包含的信息和任何意见均来自我们认为可靠的来源,但我们不代表此类信息和意见准确或完整,因此不应依赖此类信息。_cc781905-5cde- 3194-bb3b-136bad5cf58d_
没有向美国证券交易委员会、任何美国国家证券管理局或新加坡金融管理局提交注册声明。本电子邮件和/或其附件可能包含某些“前瞻性陈述”,这些陈述反映了当前对未来事件和 Novum Alpha Pte 的数字资产配置表现的看法。有限公司(“本公司”)。读者可以通过使用“展望”、“相信”、“预期”、“潜在”、“目标”、“继续”、“可能”、“将”等前瞻性词语来识别这些前瞻性陈述, “正在成为”、“应该”、“可能”、“寻求”、“大约”、“预测”、“打算”、“计划”、“估计”、“假设”、“预期”、“定位”、“目标”或这些词或其他类似词的否定版本。
特别是,这包括关于区块链行业、数字资产和公司、风险投资和众筹市场的增长以及与公司进行任何数字资产配置的潜在回报的前瞻性陈述。本电子邮件和/或其附件中包含的任何前瞻性陈述部分基于历史业绩和当前计划、估计和预期。包含前瞻性信息不应被视为公司或任何其他人对未来计划、估计或预期将实现的陈述。此类前瞻性陈述受到与公司的运营、结果、状况、业务前景、增长战略和流动性有关的各种风险、不确定性和假设的影响,包括在单独的一组文件中描述的风险。如果这些或其他风险或不确定性中的一项或多项成为现实,或者如果公司的基本假设被证明不正确,则实际结果可能与本电子邮件和/或其附件中所示的结果大不相同。_cc781905-5cde-3194-bb3b -136bad5cf58d_
因此,您不应过分依赖任何前瞻性陈述。此处包含的所有绩效和风险目标如有更改,恕不另行通知。 无法保证公司将实现任何目标或与公司进行数字资产配置会有任何回报. 历史回报不能预测未来结果。该公司旨在成为早期技术领域和数字资产的专业数字资产配置和交易工具。早期技术中的数字资产分配具有更大的风险,可能被认为是高风险和波动性的。存在与公司分配的所有数字资产全部损失的风险-有关风险的详细信息,请参阅单独的一组文件。
接受本通讯即表示您声明、保证并承诺:(i) 您已阅读并同意遵守本通知的内容,并且 (ii) 您将严格保密并保护本通讯,并同意不复制、直接或间接地重新分发或传递此通讯给任何其他人,或出于任何目的全部或部分发布此通讯。